26 Jan 2019 11:56:12
1)Orlando- NO
Orl: S Hill+ 1rnd pick NO
NO: fournier

2)Orl-Dal
Orl: H Barnes+ 1rnd pick Dal 2021
Dal: Vucevic

3)Orl-Port
Por: T ross+1rnd pick Por
Orl: M harkless

4) Orl-Charl
Charl: A gordon
Orl: Batum+ 1rnd pick Charl

1.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 13:56:01
4 trades 4 bad contacts most late round 1sts and no pg and completely dismantling a team.
Starting 5
Augustine the actual problem/ Grant
Iwundu/ g leaguer?
Barnes/ batum/ harkless/ hill/ Simmons
Issac not ready/ Martin
Bamba not ready/ birch
=
Gross.

2.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 13:57:53
#2 salary doesn't match for starters.

I think 2nd round picks for all these are probably more appropriate since they are all lottery or borderline lottery teams.

3.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 15:43:57
The trades work on the trademachine. Orlando can take extra money.

4.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 16:12:00
Trade 1: I think NO might do it

Trade 2: No from Dallas

Trade 3,4: Good trade for Portland and Charlotte. If you want to rebuild it's a good way to collect assets.

5.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 16:33:43
Gasupo, as individual trades or all this as a 5 team trade? Because #2 by itself does not pass on ESPN trade machine or realgm trade checker. Orlando cannot take on ghe $11.5 mil salary diffetence between Barnes and Vucevic.

6.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 18:38:49
Lord Fredman. Stop. You do this for every post. There is a reason people use filler bench players. It’s whether the core of the trade makes sense. No one cares about a 12th man being included for salary matching reasons. So stop. Comment on the talent received or given. No one needs to know nor care about if a scrub is included. The scrub won’t sway a trade. Jeeze.

7.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 19:29:45
So I guess its too hard to have people rise to challenge of developing actual trades scenarios instead of incompete opinions. How am I suppose to "assess talent" when all the players needed to be included are not listed? When was the last man on the roster making $11.5 mil to balance a Vucevic-Barnes trade?

I get that I may have higher standards than most here. But that also does not mean I should silence myself. Maybe you should focus your frustration onto those incapable of developing actual, CBA-approved trades that would benefit all.

8.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 19:54:05
It’s not higher standards. It’s just annoying. You are nothing more than a troll who thinks he’s this trade machine expert. Stick to the trades or just put your standards elsewhere. You literally add nothing with your “high standards”.

9.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 19:56:00
Oh. And last time I checked. Mozgov fits the bill. So again. Keep it to yourself if you just want to troll every post.

10.) 26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019 20:34:43
Congrats! You found the outlier not the norm for NBA rosters! Especially considering Mozgov isn't even on the teams in this specific trade being "discussed". But its good to see you trying to step up your game, son.

11.) 27 Jan 2019
27 Jan 2019 01:27:14
Wait. You literally just posted hey, find someone to add the money on the bench and make that trade work. I easily did. And you try to bestow incorrect knowledge in order to insult me? . You do realize Mozgov is on the magic. Right? Every trade involved the magic. Thus he is on the team.

Lemme guess son, you prob missed that and got so excited about making a quip. Epic fail son. Epic fail.

But hey. Go on. Try and say Mozgov isn’t on any team that was involved in the trades. When every one involves his team. I’m very excited to hear this amazing spin.

12.) 27 Jan 2019
27 Jan 2019 01:37:04
Also. If you want to claim it’s an outlier and there really aren’t others. Parsons? Biyombo? Anderson? Mahinmi? Dieng? Knight? Gasol?

Well. That’s just a few big dollar ones. But sure. Outlier when only a third of nba teams have these awful filler contracts. Then again. Prob would be more if people like deng and Noah weren’t amnistied.

Sorry for having high standards.

13.) 29 Jan 2019
29 Jan 2019 04:52:05
These trades just don't need to happen.