30 May 2016 15:15:06
Lakers/ Sixers/ Wolves:

Lakers Get: Jahlil Okafor

2017 Core: Russel, Clarkson, Randle, Okafor

Sixers Get: #5, Zach Lavine

2017 Core: Dunn, Lavine, Simmons, Noel, Saric, Embid

Wolves Get: #2, #26

2017 Core: Rubio, Wiggins, Ingram, KAT, Dieng.

1.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 15:28:18
Lavine isn't worth that jump, and then you add the 26 pick. Lakers wouldn't do it.

2.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 15:29:30
No to Jahlil. Lakers rather have #5 and LaVine.

3.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 15:30:30
No chance The T-wolves do that!

4.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 15:49:35
Laker fan hates OK4. They feel that they don't need a center in today's NBA- although the team tried to get Aldridge last year. They also think that OK4 and Randle together would be a bad defensive concept.

Also, I don't see how Zach Lavine gets the Wolves from 5 to 2.

5.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 15:49:36
Wow. T wolves get the number two pick for the five and lavine? Terrible value there.

6.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 18:49:24
It's not that people don't think they need a center, it's that they need a center that actually can do what is needed. If you can't move outside of the key offensively or defensively, then you better be dominant in the paint on both ends of the court.

Being a terrible defensive center might be the worst limitation any player can have in the NBA.

7.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 18:53:57
Looking back, I probably give #26 to the Lakers rather than Wolves. I think overall all 3 teams are in a better position than they would have been.

-Simmons is too raw for Lakers and Okafor is a nice fit (Lakers feel they don't need a Center? Give me a break) .

-Sixers get great guard play to go along with Noel, Saric, Embid and Simmons

-Wolves would have a "little three" and probably be 2 years and a FA signing away from competing in the West.

8.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 19:58:49
Simmons to raw for the lakers is an awful argument. Plus we will take Ingram over Simmons fits better in the offense that Luke will try and run. If the lakers wanted oak4 they could've drafted him last year.

9.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 21:13:13
My bad, I meant Ingram is too raw for the lakers. With management under pressure I'm not sure that's an "awful argument". There has been actual reports of the Lakers shopping #2 and Okafor's name has popped up. So I respectfully disagree.

10.) 31 May 2016
31 May 2016 02:32:14
Reports with no factual basis, all pure speculation. They're rumors dude like you and me and everyone else on this site is posting, guys who get paid to write do the same thing; doesn't make it a "report" though.