NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

rkenne_16's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




rkenne_16's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To rkenne_16's Posts

 

 

To rkenne_16's last 5 rumours posts

 

To rkenne_16's last 5 rumour replies

 

rkenne_16's rumours posts with other poster's replies to rkenne_16's rumours posts

 

11 Oct 2017 16:00:30
The Cavs get Asik and a top 12 protected 1st round pick

The Pelicans get Jefferson, Frye and Tavares.

The Cavs get a pick, take care of their roster problem, and shed over a million dollars helping their luxury tax situation

The Pelicans get to shed Asik's bad contract, which might be important if Cousins does resign since they would end up deep in the luxury tax. They end up with 3 players with no guaranteed money next year. They also get a reliable veteran wing in Jefferson and a guy in Frye who could play next to Davis or Cousins and spread the floor. The Pelicans need shooting and Frye can provide that at an elite level. While Davis and Cousins can make up for his deficiencies in other areas.

rkenne_16

1.) 11 Oct 2017 19:05:02
Like it for both teams.


 

 

07 Oct 2017 13:56:34
The Cavs get Aldridge, Green, and Young

The Pacers get Smith, Tavares, Jefferson, Felder, Zizic, a Spurs 1st, and 2nd

The Spurs get Thompson, Frye, Osman and the Brooklyn first

The Cavs bring in 3 guys that will help them win now. Green would be a great fit at Sg for the Cavs, Young would be an upgrade at the back up pf and has a similiar style play to Jeff Green, and Aldridge gives them a 4th allstar and player that the Warriors may struggle with given the attention they would have to give the rest of the Cavs weapons.

The Pacers take on a bad contract in smith, but get back a nice package of assets to help in a rebuild.

The Spurs need to shake things up. In a league that's turning into an arms race they have fallen behind. This opens up more cap space for them next summer, gives them a young centern who can start, gives them a top pick in the draft for Pop to mold, and I think Pop could turn Osman into better version of Danny Green.

rkenne_16

1.) 07 Oct 2017 20:34:03
sounds alright for the cavs if aldridge and green are really how they want to spend the bk pick. but this move doesn’t make much sense for the spurs if they are trying to contend this year, no denying the bk pick is great for their future but i think this trade decreases their chances in the west for this season. also, the pacers are taking a lot of garbage just to get late 1st and 2nd rounders.


2.) 07 Oct 2017 21:00:16
For the Pacers Zizic is a solid prospect who probably would have went in the first round had he come out this year rather than a few years ago, they get a first and second, Felder and Tavares both probably get looks and if they don't like what they see they're in the final guaranteed years of their contracts. Jefferson is in his last guaranteed year and could be a cheap veteran to help with the lockerroom. Smith's contract is really the only negative asset they take on.

For the Spurs, I don't think they can compete with the top of the West either way and Aldridge and Green both don't seem to be in their long term plans. They get to cash I. Now and add 2 solid pieces, while also getting a potential star in the draft and maintaining a ton of cap room to go out and get another star to go with Leonard.


3.) 09 Oct 2017 21:29:18
Pretty solid all the way around. If there was maybe someone on the light end it might be the Spurs but overall a solid proposal.


 

 

26 Sep 2017 14:21:09
The Cavs get Green and M Gasol

Memphis gets Murray, Osman, Felder, Monroe(exp), Parker(exp), Shumpert, Brooklyn first, 2 Bucks firsts lottery protected, and a Spurs first

San Antionio gets Conley and Thompson

Milwaukee gets Aldridge

rkenne_16

1.) 26 Sep 2017 18:59:12
I like this for SA and the Cavs

Not sure about Memphis, but they should tank indeed.

Milwaukee shouldn't rush. Cleveland is to strong, the next two years (or one if LBJ leaves) . So Milwaukee, shouldn't trade two draft picks for LMA.


2.) 27 Sep 2017 15:39:17
That's assuming that Giannis, doesn't opt out and leave as a FA, Gasupo.


 

 

25 Sep 2017 20:39:57
The Suns get Tavares, Jefferson(Waive), Felder and Shumpert

The Cavs get Chandler

rkenne_16

 

 

23 Sep 2017 12:20:13
The Lakers get Monroe(exp), Parker(exp), Anderson(exp) and a SA 2020 1st top 10 protected

The Spurs get Randle, Clarkson, Deng, and Parker

The Bucks get Aldridge and the Spurs 18 first

The Lakers get all the capspace they need and add a pick which could help with building depth on a team that if they sign multiple super stars in the offseason will be in desperate need of bench production.

The Spurs get an influx of young talent. The Spurs have been great at keeping players healthy, which seems like Parkers biggest weakness. If he can return near full strength under Pop's coaching he could become an allstar. Clarkson could give them a combo guard and be the heir to Manu's 6th man position. I think Pop could make Randle's post passing a real weapon. This gives them more scoring, stops their slight downward trend, and I think Pop would love the challenge of making NBA stars out of some talented young guys.

The Bucks drop a few million which has been rumored to be a goal. They cash in on Parker rather than risking it, end up with a borderline all star than can help this young team take the next step and they get a first which could be used later to add to their roster.

rkenne_16

 

 

 

rkenne_16 has no Talk Posts

 

 

rkenne_16's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Oct 2017 14:04:09
That seems like a lot of for a center that doesn't really fit with the rest of the team's timeline. Challenging the Cavs this year was always a long shot. Now that Hayward is out, in my opinion, they should trade Horford for assets and contracts that would help them get a young big man sometime in the next year and a half. Loading up to make a run next year and for the foreseeable future makes the most sense. Why rush now and potentially give up assets that could actually win them a title down the line rather than assets that might get them back to the ECFs this year.

rkenne_16

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Oct 2017 15:02:07
Yeah, Boston, Cleveland, Milwaukee, Charlotte and Detroit in the East could all beat that and could be suitors. In the West, Portland, SA in a 3 way, both LAs, the Rocketsand the Thunder could probably put together better packages.

rkenne_16

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Oct 2017 13:44:12
Billj, I think Memphis would want something fairly significant for Gasol. I don't think it would be worth it for Boston to give up assets for him. Especially if they still have their eyes on adding another young big man (AD, KP, Turner, or Gobert would be ideal) .

rkenne_16

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Oct 2017 11:16:56
NOs would want atleast one high end pick or prospect for Cousins. This makes no sense for them. I doubt they would even want, the pick will be fairly late and Oubre is doesn't have enough upside to make it worth it.

rkenne_16

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Oct 2017 10:35:19
Billj, Gasol is to old to fit with what the Celtics are doing. Now with the Hayward injury, I think what little chance there was that Boston would go after Cousins is probably gone. I think they'll wait it out to see if Davis is available come next year.

rkenne_16

 

 

 

rkenne_16 has no Talk Replies