NBA Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

hamburger's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




hamburger's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To hamburger's Posts

 

 

To hamburger's last 5 rumours posts

 

To hamburger's last 5 rumour replies

 

hamburger's rumours posts with other poster's replies to hamburger's rumours posts

 

05 Aug 2017 12:53:56
Well, seems like the Suns offer for Irving is bledsoe bender and a protected 1st. Not terrrrrrible return, but is that really worth guaranteeing lebron leaves? In that case Bledsoe is worthless as he won't be in the plans of a rebuild. So Irving for bender and a protected 1st?

Pretty crappy when you think about it long term.

hamburger

1.) 05 Aug 2017 14:35:15
Yeah, if I'm the Cavs I need atleast another pick, prospect, or atleast Warren instead of Bender. If they could get that and Lebron walks, they could probably flip Bledsoe for something like another 1st and a midlevel prospect. Not a ridiculous return on Irving, but an ok start on a rebuild and they could still move Love as well. Although, I'd probably wait until the allstar break on him so people could see what he can look like as the center point to the offense.


2.) 06 Aug 2017 14:51:14
No. Ou miss the point. You can ask what you want. You aren't getting more.

He demanded a trade. Is a one way player. Already implied he is a 2 year rental.

The question is if that is enough to guarantee lebron leaves. If it is. Do the trade. If not. Keep Irving. Ain't getting more.


3.) 06 Aug 2017 15:17:06
Hamburger I see where your coming from. But the suns have to worry about Irving leaving as well.


 

 

16 Jul 2017 15:25:46
Knicks - Portland

Melo

Crabbe and Harkness

Ideally, would be AMAZING if the knicks could somehow package Noah for Leonard or Turner as well, but thinking this is a solid return. Solid players, 25 and under, fits the Knicks plans.

Will Melo agree? Probably not. BUT, Portalnd is a rather attractive location Melo.

Lillard, McCollum, Melo, Turner, Nurkic. seems rather solid.

hamburger

1.) 16 Jul 2017 15:52:57
Like the idea, just agree with the thought that Portland isn't a destination Melo will agree to. That team would svore a ton of points though.


2.) 16 Jul 2017 15:56:48
No chance Anthony heads out there never to be heard from again. He's a big-city guy and playing with his friends is more important than winning basketball games.


3.) 16 Jul 2017 16:10:27
Agreed Jvoung, but i'm starting to think given the situation of things, he may decide to if he really sees the potential. Clearly he isn't just doing the big city thing anymore, and he is looking to win, unless Houston and Cleveland have suddenly become happening places and neither is a contender (those are the two cities he agreed to) . Interesting option. Also, Portland really does seem like a team and franchise on the rise. Great scorers, lots of players in their prime, basketball wise, its a great fit.

Should be an interesting few weeks, but the fun thing is, clearly melo has a decent amount of value as at least 3-4 teams are trying to snag him. Hopefully the knicks play this to their advantage and get a good return.


4.) 16 Jul 2017 16:34:38
If Melo does agree to a Blazers trade, Crabbe and Harkless are both decent, young players. This would be a quality deal for Knicks. I think a couple guys with ok upside is better then a late first rd pick. Knicks bench is so thin on talent, these two guys could play a role ( however at a price. I believe Crabbe and Harkless together make about $29mill per year) .


5.) 16 Jul 2017 16:38:46
They do make about that. It works out salary-wise. My guess is that the knicks would likely snag a pick or two as well, just because there clearly is some competition for Melo. but I would be rather pleased if they could somehow send off Noah in the deal as well without the picks.

Either way, it seems like a potential suitor. Should be an interesting few weeks.


6.) 16 Jul 2017 18:22:46
I like the deal, and it would open up the possibility of dealing Lee for something as well.

I wouldn't have said this a week ago, but maybe Anthony does waive his no trade for a team like the Blazers. He evidently (and rightfully so) wants out of NY. It may not be the team he wants to be with ultimately, but with an opt out at the end of the year, it can also be a one year pit stop. With all three of his buddies potentially being FA's next year, he could potentially join one or more of them then. I've always said, I could pretty much anything for a year if it would earn me $29M! :)


7.) 17 Jul 2017 05:16:18
no chance Portland sends both Crabbe and Harkless and neither of Turner or Leonard.


8.) 17 Jul 2017 12:09:21
Um, actuallly a good chance. Because ya know. Portland actually has to try if they want to convince the Knicks and also melo. But sure homer go for it. Lots of takers of turner and Leonard. Clearly.


 

 

18 Jul 2016 15:24:44
rumors about knicks sixers trade discussions. I can see why both teams would consider it, just not sure how the fit is.

Knicks trade: O'Quinn, future 1st and maybe Courtney Lee

Sixers trade: Okafor

There are obvious reasons why the knicks would do this. Spacing wouldn't be an issue with Porzingis, plus Porzingis' rim protection would help make up for Okafor's lacking in that area. Okafor would also likely come off the bench and be able to develop more naturally.

The sixers would only do this because of the log jam at big man. My guess is they would get more attractive offers, but really, who knows. There hasn't been THAT much serious interest for Okafor thus far, so who knows.

hamburger

1.) 18 Jul 2016 15:46:42
So you believe the "rumor" that's sportsrageous put out. Why would they trade a center for another center?


2.) 18 Jul 2016 15:50:46
Not a chance in hell you trade Okafor for garbage like that.


3.) 18 Jul 2016 16:47:32
A) I don't believe it will happen. Do I believe there may have been discussions internally or even perhaps between the teams? Sure. It was just a interesting posting that I decided to throw out there.

B) Not a chance in hell they trade okafor for an unprotected 1st round pick, for a team you have spent months, probably years, bashing, so clearly it would be a valuable 1st. I mean, what's the deal Tre. you call the knicks one of the worst teams. but then when the value of the return package is based on your estimation of how bad they are. no chance. the knicks are too good to have that be a valuable pick? Probably should pick a side and stick with it as opposed to just immediately hitting the angry bitter post button before thinking.

C) Calm down tre. We all know Okafor is the second coming of Kareem Abdul Jabar, mixed with Olajowon, and a dash of Jesus Christ. But even still, the sixers are moving a big man. they have diminished value because they are obviously moving one. Oquinn was a salary filler, the players of value were potentially lee and more importantly, an unprotected 1st from the team you talk a bunch of smack on, until it actually comes time to get their pick, then its garbage. It is way too early for you to be this salty. Seriously. do you just wake up bitter?


4.) 18 Jul 2016 16:51:31
The Knicks have nothing of interest for the Sixers. It would have to be a multiple team trade with Melo going somewhere else.


5.) 18 Jul 2016 17:23:33
Hamburger. The Knicks just signed half the average free agents in the league. So yes they are completely different now then a year ago when they were terrible. They still will struggle with chemistry with som many ball hogs on the same team but they will be around 35 to 40 wins and their " unprotected first is then mid first round. You don't trsde Okafor for lee and mid first and o Quinn. That's three most likely nobodies for a young center on a great contract who probably would be the Knicks best player in a year or two next to prozingus. So not a chance in hell is a pretty good description of that bs trade. i'd rather keep Oakfor as a bench piece then give him away for a bunch of junk.


6.) 18 Jul 2016 17:25:36
O and hamburger. I garrenttee you were more bitter then me in that post as it took three paragraph of you ranting about someone else being bitter.


7.) 18 Jul 2016 17:33:05
Maybe next year, when the sixers have to pay Noel and the Knicks pick go's high in the draft.

I like this for NY, but not a chance sixers do this now :-)


8.) 18 Jul 2016 17:34:10
Weird. didn't you just like 2 weeks ago claim Porzingis to be the most overrated player. That he hasn't done a thing, and until he rebounds more than 7 rebounds a game he's no where near Okafor and his legendary back to the basket game?

Its just odd. because now you say Porzingis will absolutely be better than him in the coming years. So hard to follow you. Just make bitter salty statements, no matter if they are consistant with prior statements.

Like what I say or not. at least I stay relatively consistent in my thoughts as to just changing them to disagree.

food for thought Mr. Salty.


9.) 18 Jul 2016 20:53:32
I didn't say absolutely. I said Oakfor is first or second best player on that team in a year or two. Prozingus even if he does the exact same season as last year is second best on the Knicks. Melo and prozingus as of now. But melo is getting old. Rose and Noah both old or injury prone. So yes prozingus will be the best player on a crappy team Ina year or two. That being said. If Oakfor went there prozingus will have to improve a lot to get anywhere close to Okafor In a Year or two. In other words Okafor would be the best player on that team unless prozingus, Who I already established is the best player on that crappy team ( in two years), Gets considerably better. Right now he's just an over hyped New York knick. I don't limit a guy like him in the future. But based on wat we've seen so far he's over rated. Damn you really need to hop off dude.


10.) 18 Jul 2016 20:56:36
No from both teams. Knicks are not moving Noah's $18M contract to the bench for Okafor, and Philly is not getting enough from this deal.


11.) 18 Jul 2016 21:45:35
Actually tre. if you actually read what you wrote. you said okafor will be the best player in a year or two NEXT TO porzingis. What that means is that he will be the second best player, because based off your sentence, porzingis would be the best.

So yes. Reading what you wrote. You said exactly that. Floppy McSalty Flop.


12.) 19 Jul 2016 18:50:45
Lol so you disagree with my trade saying I overvalue sixes players, but yet here you are proposing a trade sending Okafor to the Knicks for Courtney Lee and Kyle oquinn?!?!?! You are way over valuing those guys, Okafor is going to be a STUD, the only reason he's on the block is because of the bad fit on his current team and the plethora of bugs they currently have, Okafor would bring back the best return. Also the Knicks JUST signed Courtney Lee. Why in the hell would they trade him b4 he's played a game, I mean when has that EVER happened? That'll also put the Knicks in a bind bcuz there are no more worthy starting 2 guards left In free agency. This proposal in beyond retarded.


 

 

 

hamburger has no Talk Posts

 

 

hamburger's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Jul 2018 13:43:27
Dude. Celtics fans are insane. Jaylen Brown. Rozier. And some crap picks will never get you that. NEVER.

hamburger

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jun 2018 21:33:20
It is so hard to read what you write. But that Celtics trade never happens. Ever. It’s just a horrible trade for the Celtics.

hamburger

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Jun 2018 19:09:14
Ahh, the classic trade of THJ for nothing.

PG13 and LBJ aren't signing 1 year deals.

Besides. let's do some math here

30+30+25.250+18.15+6.434=109.834 for the starting lineup.

But hey, for shiggles, let's see the rest.

23.687 for the back up vets.

Then figure another 10 million for the rookies.

And were coming in at 143.521. Sounds likely.

hamburger

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Jun 2018 16:02:30
Why didn't you just end the comment at NO. You start off talking about how rather than rambling on, its easier to just say NO. Then you blab for like 10 lines. One or the other, otherwise you sound stupid.

hamburger

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Jun 2018 15:59:36
CP3 is getting max money, that trade for Davis is horrible.

But even still, its funny to see how foolish your math is.

LBJ 30 mill, PG13 26.5 mill, CP3 20 mill, AD 25.4. Even if LBJ, PG13 and CP3 all take big pay cuts (they wont, and everyone knows it), you are now at the cap and have 4 people. Awesome. That sounds like a winner of an idea.

hamburger

 

 

 

hamburger has no Talk Replies